Investigation launched into 'monstrous' claims scientist has genetically edited humans

First-gene edited babies are here

First-gene edited babies are here

Although China prohibits human cloning, it does not specifically outlaw gene editing.

Rice University has opened an investigation into one of its professors who reportedly helped make the world's first genetically-edited babies, a claim that has sparked an global controversy over science and ethics. Dr.

A Chinese scientist has revealed that he helped create the world's first genetically edited babies. "The babies are home now with their mom Grace and their dad Mark".

The scientist said he had given the babies immunity to HIV by disabling a gene called CCR5, which producers a protein that acts as a receptor for the virus, causing it to spread across the human body. The children's father is HIV-positive. So far, says JK, it has resulted in one pregnancy. A pre-print is a publication of findings made before the research is published in a peer-reviewed journal.

The university said He's work "seriously violated academic ethics and standards" and planned to investigate.

"This event might be analogous to Louise Brown in 1978", wrote George Church, a prominent Harvard geneticist, in an email.

The group sent out a statement condemning the apparent genetic editing without "maximum transparency and strict oversight", saying that before moving forward with the use of genetic editing, preclinical research should be used to find risks and benefits, and that genetic editing should only be used in the absence of reasonable alternatives. He also spoke about his research with organizers of an global conference on gene editing in Hong Kong, the AP reported.

Doudna also cited the worldwide consensus reached in 2015. Doudna helped discover CRISPR and organize the summit. She doesn't think that is the case in this situation. "Why would you use this instead of an already established approach?" Scientists have long searched for ways to block this pathway to protect people from HIV.

The team's lead scientist, He Jiankui, told the Associated Press (AP) that one couple in the trial had given birth to twin girls this month.

Baylis said it was also ethically questionable that He chose to address an HIV gene, when there are other less risky ways to prevent HIV.

They also noted evidence that the editing was incomplete and that at least one twin appears to be a patchwork of cells with various changes. "This verified the gene surgery worked safely", He says. But, according to the Associated Press, other researchers denounced the research as human experimentation.

"Using these technologies prematurely can really adversely impact the entire scientific field", Caulfield went on.

‘We Will Close the Border Permanently if Need Be’
Around 2,000 migrants have agreed to return to their countries of origin with the help of the Mexican authorities. It said that 1,906 of those who have returned were members of the recent caravans.

The Chinese researcher said he practised editing mice, monkey and human embryos in the lab for several years and has applied for patents on his methods. The tool has been used recently to treat deadly diseases in adults, but not in editing sperm, eggs, or embryos. People with one copy of the gene can still get HIV, although some very limited research suggests their health might decline more slowly once they do. Researchers are working hard to make CRISPR editing ever more precise.

"What is a bit more revolutionary is that these children were allegedly engineered to provide resistance to a disease".

But making changes in human DNA that could be passed down for generations has always been considered off-limits.

"If it's true as reported then it's an extremely premature and questionable experiment in creating genetically modified children", said Jeffrey Kahn, director of the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics.

But the development of CRISPR has prompted some scientists to rethink that prohibition for medical purposes.

Where you live determines if, or what kind of, research can be performed on human embryos.

Many scientists have stated that Dr.

He said: "It contravenes decades of ethical consensus and guidelines on the protection of human participants in research".

"Throwing open the door to a society of genetic haves and have-nots undermines our chances for a fair and just future", Darnovsky says.

Faced with a barrage of criticism, He defended his work.

"I understand my work will be controversial, but I believe families need this technology", he says in one of the videos.

Latest News